Mastery is efficiency. A master of their art simultaneously exerts less effort, and achieves greater results than others. Wouldn’t it would be wonderful if attaining mastery was as easy as defining it?
It is that easy, and that difficult.
Defining mastery is the same as understanding mastery, is the same as embodying mastery. An accurate definition guides productive study and practice, which leads to greater skill and understanding; this in turn provides the foundation for a clearer definition. It is a continuous upward spiral of feedback and refinement.
Without this clarification, no amount of effort can lead to improvement. The spiral flattens out, and the student runs in circles. There is movement, but no progress.
Unfortunately, most students do not recognize the importance of a clear definition as a destination, or acknowledge the fact that it will change over time. With no destination, and no way to measure their progress towards it, they can only imitate their instructor and hope for the best. This is not the road to mastery, but to mediocrity. Even supposing their witless imitation is a faithful one, it will be ill-fitted to their unique body and temperament. Furthermore, the student will emulate their instructors’ bad habits and personal quirks. After a few generations of such dilution, the original skills are inevitably lost.
The great kung fu masters of the past did not acquire their exceptional skills through rote imitation. Nobody taught Aikido to Morihei Ueshiba, or Yang Tai Chi to Yang Luchan, or Yiquan to Wang Xiangzhai, to name a few examples; their respective arts did not exist until they created them. Though these arts were certainly influenced by the traditions of the ancestors, they were perfected through direct observation of universal law.
According to Morihei Ueshiba himself:
Morihei Ueshiba
Founder of Aikido
All techniques, every one, must be in line with the Truth of the Universe. Technique which is not will surely rebound and cause the destruction of one’s own body. Any martial activity which is not tied to the universe in harmony is not to be called the art of Takemusu.
This raises a few questions, among them:
- How is martial arts study an investigation of universal law?
- What should a student be doing in class, if not imitating the instructor?
Loading ...
7 responses so far ↓
1 wujimon // Jan 12, 2007
This reminds me of the following quote by an unknown author:
“The key to giving one’s life meaning is to take on something and master it! To go for less is poor.
As someone once said, we should not seek to be like the masters of old, but to seek what they sought.”
Great thoughts on imitation leading to mediocrity!
2 Nneka // Jan 14, 2007
Great masters always tell their shining students that they will be greater than the master. I think that’s because students who really immerse themselves in a teaching come to a greater understanding of it. It’s like the master passes on the torch.
Mimicry is needed to get the mechanics and technical aspect of it, but you have to come to your own understanding, have your own experience, have it seep into your being. No one can show you how to do it.
BTW, I don’t do martial arts, but I am deepening my understanding of Spirit. This has been my experience.
In Spirit,
Nneka
3 Chris // Jan 15, 2007
There is a strong relationship between spirituality and high-level martial arts, as you might surmise from the Ueshiba quote above. But even at the most basic level, martial arts are concerned with what we might politely term “reincarnation assistance”.
Personal Development Carnival 01/14/07 - Spirituality Applied to Life - Balanced Life Center // Jan 13, 2007
[…] Chris presents Mimicry is Not the Path to Mastery posted at Martial Development. […]
Replace Your Traditions With Best Practices // Aug 18, 2007
[…] dojang or kwoon. When you celebrate tradition, you are really celebrating purposeless and corrupted imitation. It is neither a guarantee of fidelity nor of quality. Following tradition is among the worst […]
Qi Dao – Tibetan Shamanic Qigong: Book Review // Dec 10, 2007
[…] The signature element of Qi Dao as a qigong style is its emphasis on physicality, unadulterated by the choreography of strictly defined forms. Just as Jesus Christ was no Christian and Shakyamuni was not a Buddhist, Lama Tantrapa teaches that we should not expect to attain self-realization by staring at the ground and tracing another person’s footsteps. […]
a buddhist carnival - 2nd edition // Dec 15, 2007
[…] the signature element of qi dao as a qigong style is its emphasis on physicality, unadulterated by the choreography of strictly defined forms. just as jesus christ was no christian and shakyamuni was not a buddhist, lama tantrapa teaches that we should not expect to attain self-realization by staring at the ground and tracing another person’s footsteps. […]
Leave a Comment