His Wing Chun Couldn’t Win A Real Fight

68 responses so far ↓

• 1 Rick Matz // Nov 6, 2007

  Sue the pants off of everyone in sight?

• 2 Dean // Nov 6, 2007

  The simplest technique in martial arts is to avoid a fight in the first place. In this case, it would be to do anything to keep the conflict from escalating. If it gets to the point where blows are exchanged, you have already lost. If you fight, not only do you have to deal with the consequences to yourself of having hurt someone, but you have to worry about whether they’re going to sue you or get a weapon and/or friends to escalate the conflict further.

  The Karate Kid comes to mind:
  Miyagi: “So why study Karate?”
  Daniel: “So I don’t have to fight.”
  Miyagi: “Now use head for something other than target!”

  Of course…knowing is one thing, and applying is a different animal.
  (paraphrased from B. Lee: “Knowing is not enough, we must apply; willing is not enough, we must do.”)

• 3 karrie // Nov 6, 2007

  Walk away if at all possible.

• 4 Zee // Nov 6, 2007

  Hi! I came over from NaBloPoMo. I’m challenging myself to comment on as many blogs as possible this month as well as post.

  Avoidance. Dean’s right: knowing and applying are two different tasks altogether. One never knows how crazy a person is.

  Happy Posting!

• 5 Thomas // Nov 7, 2007

  The only way to end a real fight would be to not get in one in the first place, obviously. But what if one is forced into the situation? Sure, we’d all like to act high and mighty and say that we’d diffuse any situation before it escalates to that point, but we’re all only human, and even we make mistakes sometimes. Heck, it may not even be a mistake and we just run into someone who’s determined to take our lives, whether for the color of our skin or for some other reason. What should we do then? Try and kill them all?

  What can we do in this turbulent world of ours but try our best to survive?

• 6 Chris // Nov 7, 2007

  My question was about ending a fight, not avoiding one. I think this is a critical distinction that some of you missed.

• 7 taijiquestion // Nov 8, 2007

  Ending a real fight you said. A “real” fight ends when one side or the other is defeated. The “realness” is specifically about this intent, this resolve, to do real harm.

  What constitutes defeat may vary. In “street” situations, the range could be from “got run off, turned tail” to “hurt and bleeding” to “killed him dead”.

  Sometimes in novels we read that the true way to end a bullying/dominance type of fight is to hurt the initiator so bad that not only is that fight ended, but he will not attempt a future rematch.

  But I don’t think I have the answer to your question. Interested in what it is, though.

• 8 Chris // Nov 8, 2007

  What constitutes defeat may vary. In “street” situations, the range could be from “got run off, turned tail” to “hurt and bleeding” to “killed him dead”.

  I would argue that all of these are deferrals. See Brandon’s case above, where his enemies did turn tail and run–only to return with a force multiplier. When did that fight end? Has it ended at all?

  Sometimes in novels we read that the true way to end a bullying/dominance type of fight is to hurt the initiator so bad that not only is that fight ended, but he will not attempt a future rematch.

  There is a danger that if you strike too hard, your would-be bully will become genuinely afraid for their life, and change tactics accordingly. Then you’ve started the very fight you hoped to prevent!

• 9 Steve // Nov 9, 2007

  While I can’t imagine wanting or needing to do so, killing one’s opponent is the only way to make sure he doesn’t come back with a gun.

• 10 Joseph // Nov 9, 2007

  Like some people here have said if you get in a fight you can’t get out of and he might come back and kill you then kill him first.

• 11 Emlyn // Nov 9, 2007

  To lose with no-one being hurt. Very difficult to do…

• 12 taijiquestion // Nov 10, 2007

  I just realized that the title of this post is very well-put. “His Wing Chun Couldn’t Win A Real Fight”.

  It seems that a “real fight” is one with no rules. And no cap on the damage.

  There are some fights where if one guy gets knocked down and doesn’t jump right back up, but lies there rubbing his jaw, then the fight is over, more or less. I’ve been that guy, rubbing my jaw, surprised that I went down but vaguely glad that my nose wasn’t broken, or some such.

  If the other man had commenced kicking me in the ribs or stomping my hands, that would have been another story.

  What with all the guns around nowadays, things can get fatal real fast.

  My son is not allowed to have a plastic “picnic” knife in his school lunch, or any other edged implement whatsoever. There is a zero-tolerance policy. A 2-inch pocket knife could conceivably get him expelled.

  Some world we live in.

• 13 Scott in SF // Nov 13, 2007

  A fight is only over when you both agree it is over. A fight is a contest that only ends when both sides agree it is finished. Or when one voice ceases to exist. A person’s voice can even continue a fight after he/she is dead, it is usually called vengeance, and is generally carried out by an affiliate.
  That is why it is imperative in acts of aggressive domination by an alpha male that the subordinate male says ‘uncle’!

• 14 Drew // Dec 22, 2007

  The title of this is :
  “His Wing Chun Couldn’t Win A Real Fight”

  Yet in the article you said that “Brandon beat both men”….Tell me what style could stop a bullet…..Not only did he beat one guy he beat two and that was all because he took Wing Chun. ….The title of your story is just SAD.

• 15 Chris // Dec 22, 2007

  Yes, it is sad when people invest so much effort in the study of martial art, and discover too late that their preferred techniques cannot end a real fight.

  Wing Chun can stop a bullet, as can most martial arts when applied skillfully.

• 16 Kyle // Feb 18, 2008

  by no means is this statement all inclusive, but i have heard it said by wing chun practitioners that to end a fight you have three options; take their breath, take their consciousness, or take their life. We must be willing to accept these terms when we engage in a fight. It is up to the artist to assess the situation as it enfolds to decide which of three must be done, in terms of one is a little more permanent than the other two. Any thoughts?

• 17 Chris // Feb 20, 2008

  I agree with that statement in the tactical sense. The story above highlights its strategic shortcomings.

• 18 Kungfuguy // Mar 16, 2008

  Well he ended the battle but the war was’nt over. When it is situation like this always remeber it is never over you could beat the crap out of someone think it is over and leave then when your asleep a week later he breaks in your house and kills you inyour sleep. Martial arts was’nt invented for the purpose of fighting people made it to protect themselves and over the years it has become more developed. It has evolved to face newer threats it’s time martial arts teaches how to really end a war not just one battle.

• 19 Kungfuguy // Mar 16, 2008

  Damm key board i meant it was invented for fighting martial arts does mean arts of war after all.

• 20 Dexter // May 26, 2008

  That’s right, Scott!
  A fight is only over when each and every side agrees it is over.
  Period.

• 21 Rob // Aug 8, 2008

  “One does not have to win, rather not have to lose”
  Therefore if Bradon had left the scene of the fight after he had beat both the neighbours, then he would not have won the fight but neither would he have lost. By walking away, you can end the fight, not by winning, but by not losing.

• 22 Karate_and_Taiji_student // Aug 8, 2008

  Funny, I just wrote something similar in response to another post … Deja vu.

  >Brandon was forced to defend himself from their savage attack.

  The article does not describe what lead to that situation in the first place. I don’t think there is much to be learned from this situation other than martial art skills being useless in self-defense situations.

  The solution would have been to properly deescalate the argument before a fight broke out. I do neither claim this is easy to do nor that it is easy to learn properly.

  But I do claim that it won’t take years to learn like Wing Chun (maybe about a year with regular training) and that it will be much, much, much more useful in life.

• 23 Shifu // Aug 13, 2008

  Not knowing all of the details, but using the scenario described, it appears that the “fight” started with the “argument.” It could have been “ended” with the “argument” (it takes 2 to tango)! Simply, walk away (most difficult thing to do). Any martial art (including Wing Chun) has a spiritual discipline. Martial arts is a state of spirituality first, mentality second, and physiology last! Had it not escalated, it would have never been a fistfight ending in bloodshed (this is the lowest level).

• 24 Miguelblaze23 // Aug 19, 2008

  I agree with Scott, both sides must acquiesce, or decide that the fight is finished, and having said that, i am of the belief that while we are all fallible, a person trained to the degree that they can effectively defend themselves against two attackers simultaneously, is likely to have the disciple and good sense to not provoke said attackers in an escalating situation. The sad fact is that sometimes a person is chosen as a target, and no amount of discussion, reasoning, or even submission will prevent an attack, attackers such as that put no stock in honor or fairness, nor are they likely to learn their “lesson”. and we come back to the issue, always, that martial arts training, no matter the degree, does not make you invincible, yes, bullets will go through us as easily as the next person, but i think it is ignorant to imply that; if martial arts training doesnt make you invulnerable to damage, its a waste of time. I cant begin to tell you how martial arts has enriched my life, i can defend myself and others in hand to hand situations if necessary, exuding that security and confidence renders me all but invisible to predators who look for easy prey, the martial virtue alone that the student develops is priceless. Maybe there were things ‘Brandon’ could have done to avoid physical confrontation, but none of us here know this person, with the exception possibly of the blog writer. As the events are written, assuming they are accurate, “Brandon was forced to defend himself”, so again the assumption is he had no other recourse, it did not say brandon was forced to run, or to talk calmly, but specifically to fight, which any accomplished student knows is an absolute last resort, in which case you are fighting for your very life or the life of another who cannot defend him or herself. So all that to say two things really,

  1. Neutralize the threat (letting defeated attackers free does not constitute neutralizing anything)
  2. Notify authorities and paramedics immediately

  *it may not always seem so, but self defense is still legal (for the time being), even by martial arts students, so long as you use “situationally appropriate force”

  **as joked on as it may be, after notifying authorities, one citizen may detain another citizen until the police or appropriate agency arrives,

  these two things are within our rights as american citizens, but it is also a sad reality that sometimes violence (i.e. shootings, stabbings, etc..) is completely random and unprovoked, in my opinion, we arent guaranteed anything in this world, and every minute alive is precious. i think you should love your family and friends, pursue your dreams, and thank whomever you fancy for the time you have to do so.

  -sorry if i went off on a tangent, but this is just a collection of my thoughts on the subject,

  -Miguel

• 25 yip man junior // Oct 1, 2008

  His wing chun was not real, if it was he would of dodged the bullets

• 26 Matthew (in Toronto) // Dec 4, 2008

  Chris, this is a great case study for Wing Chun, and other martial arts students. It would be helpful to know the details leading up to and just before the physical confrontation with the neighbors. This might illuminate what the victim (even a Wing Chun person can be one) might have said or done differently in hindsight to have lessened the likelihood of the hand-combat attack, which led to the neighbors ‘losing face’ when they were defeated, which led to the gun re-attack.

• 27 Chris // Dec 4, 2008

  Matthew, I agree that the full story would be instructive. However, I don’t have many details beyond what I have written, and I also want to respect the privacy of those involved.

  I’ll just say that anyone who wants more information on this event, can ask on the WCCG mailing list.

• 28 Tanois // Dec 27, 2008

  I think he should lose the fight. Sometimes in order to win you must lose.

  A lot of times conflict is about emotions and pride. Most guys are merely content to just hit you a couple times to show that they are a big man. The most dangerous thing to hurt in any man is his pride.

  Maybe Brandon should have only used Wing Chun to minimize the damage instead of inflicting it.

• 29 No-Mind // Dec 27, 2008

  Chris,

  How exactly can any martial art STOP a bullet? You have made a very ignorant and deadly statement. No martial art can STOP a bullet.

  It sounds like he did END the fight because he whooped both those guys. You cant expect to kill both of the assailants if they gave up or ran off. He shouldve called the police after the fight and probably shouldve left to cool off somewhere.

  So, Mr Chris…how exactly do you plan to STOP a bullet that is being shot at you? If you meant that any martial art can disarm an attacker or something similar then maybe that’s more feasible if the practitioner knows how and has practiced enough. How you put that though isnt the same. NO MARTIAL ART CAN PHYSICALLY STOP A BULLET FROM PENETRATING YOUR SKIN. MARTIAL ARTS ALONE ARE NOT ENOUGH. THERE IS NO SUCH MARTIAL ART AS BULLETPROOF-FU.

• 30 Miguel // Dec 27, 2008

  Chris,
  perhaps you truly intended to provoke thought, but this discussion has spiraled sharply downward into a waste of time. Any answer to any question can be challenged by a “what if”. my years in the military provided me with a quote that embodies this way of thinking: “what if frogs had machine guns? then snakes wouldnt mess with them”, meaning this has become ridiculous and asinine. all this business of stopping bullets is just as meaningless. and to the person who suggested you just take the beating because they might not seriously hurt you, would you suggest that to your children? especially given that many such attacks are sexual in nature. also, i am aware of no techniques within wing chun that will minimize personal injury without inflicting some measure upon the attacker, would you really trust the good nature of a person who is violently attacking you? again, we are assuming there was no choice but to fight….or to just take it (i guess), and hope “it” isnt too terrible. see, this is an argument with no end, i see (on a martial arts forum) “forced to defend himself” and to me it clearly means NO OTHER HONORABLE OPTION, however im sure this is going to be what-if’d into a whole other topic, and i do feel that honor is worth dying for, so please do not ask that question.

• 31 Cobra-Kai // Dec 28, 2008

  you should sleep with a bullet proof vest

• 32 Chris // Dec 28, 2008

  No-Mind,
  A good martial art stops the bullet before it has been fired. This is a closed-door system, and emotionally imbalanced people are not invited to learn it.

  Miguel,
  Tanois may not be familiar with Wing Chun. The worst thing anyone can do in these situations is to hit, and hit softly. On the other hand, we are never *literally* forced to defend ourselves, and it is hard to know whether Brandon made the right decision with this escalation.

  Cobra-Kai,
  A vest doesn’t cover one’s head.

• 33 No-Mind // Dec 28, 2008

  Chris,

  Who said anything about being unbalanced?

  If you and I were in the country, far out where not a single person resided, I would test your “closed door” bulletproof-fu” but only in a non letal area of your body.

  Wing Chun by itself cannot and will not produce any type of bulletproofage. We can talk about qigong and neigong all you like but even then, to be able to stop a bullet isnt something that anyone can actually hope to develop.

• 34 No-Mind // Dec 28, 2008

  I’m not saying that being bulletproof or stoping a bullet is impossible, I’m saying that it takes too much determination for your average Joe..or Chris

• 35 Tanois // Dec 28, 2008

  Well you guys are right. I am not familiar with Wing Chun fighting but I’ve been in and witnessed quite a few streetfights. There are very few fights where you lack the option to just run or drive away.

  Well I’m just suggesting to lose the fight (assuming one cannot run away) because the details provided seemed to suggest violence motivated by a simple kind of anger over a dispute.

  In the details provided it didn’t seem like it would be a situation where it was a murderous kind of anger. The anger only turned murderous once Brandon beat up both of his attackers.

  The situation didn’t seem to be sexually motivated at all.

  All reactions need to be based upon the circumstances. I don’t believe that in every situation (when someone attacks you with violence) automatically justifies beating someone up based on some blanket assumption that the opponent is going to go all the way with it.

  What if your girlfriend starts throwing things at you or hitting you in the heat of an argument? What if a guy at a club comes swinging at you because he thinks you’re making passes at his girlfriend? What if your neighbor rushes you and starts pummeling at you over a dispute over your fruit trees dropping fruits on his property?

  Off course you are going to act at one’s own discretion under these various circumstances.

  Off course in imminent danger or sexual abuse you should first run and then as a last resort fight to end the situation permanently. There isn’t a one size fit all solution but as an interested outsider to the discussion these are just my opinions.

• 36 Cobra-Kai // Dec 28, 2008

  then put a helmet on and a bullet proof vest and bullet proof pants problem solved

• 37 Miguel // Dec 29, 2008

  Tanois,
  a flurry of what if’s, how surprising. no, the situation provided did not seem sexual in nature at all, but you made a very generalized statement about an entire gender, thats what i was responding to. I am not saying you should twist everyone in half that looks at you sideways, obviously your individual gauge of personal danger is a factor. please do not misunderstand, i have only my opinion, i dont pretend to know everything, i am completely fallible. I think we are arguing apples and oranges though, or we are possibly saying the same thing in different ways; i do not condone violence, i have not taught one student that i thought had bad intentions. i believe that at the very root of martial arts, there is an art form, which must have martial applications; i believe that if you lean too far one way or the other problems arise. i have re-read our posts and i notice a commonality, last resort, no other choice, we are in agreement, we are just saying it different ways. but the piece of yours about most guys just wanting to hit you a few times and feel like big men, that feels to me like a dangerous train of thought. i cannot agree with that, certainly avoid fighting if possible, if they are not willing to let you escape however, i could not in good conscience advise someone to not defend themselves.

  Chris,
  i would agree that no one is forced to defend themselves, a person always has options however unwise they may be. The daily news is full of stories about people exercising foolish alternatives. “the right thing” is a difficult beast to track, expert in camouflage, and at times seems impossible to locate. But, if we remain vigilant and pursue it tirelessly, we can usually avoid “the wrong thing”.

• 38 Tanois // Dec 29, 2008

  Thanks for the replies Miguel and Chris. Even though I am more or less an outsider, the original post has really put my mind to thinking about the concepts and theories of conflict management and escalation. I apologize for generalizing and most definitely the degree of reaction would be completely dependent upon the judgment of the practitioner to discern the level of danger and conflict.

  Even though a lot of it came down to “what if” I think the “what if”s are very good points when it comes down to actual fighting under real world situations. From the original post it would seem like Wing Chun like many martial arts is akin to a tool or weapon. Knowing when, where, and how to use it is as important as knowing under what situations justifies the use and discharge of a firearm. The hypotheticals and the theory behind the reaction towards each of them actually intrigues me and has provoked much thought in me for the last few days.

  “Though the multiplicity of martial arts techniques might suggest otherwise, there is only one way to end a real fight. The method is a simple one, but as it requires great strength, few people can use it consistently and effectively. Do you know what it is? ”

  With such a provocative statement I now must be forced to ask: So what is the “only one way to end a real fight”?

  So if physically beating his opponents only escalated the situation, and running away was not an option, and killing his opponents was not an option, and submission to their beating was not an option then what would be the only true way to end a real fight?

• 39 Chris // Dec 30, 2008

  Tanois,
  Much of “traditional martial arts” training makes a distinction between offensive and defensive techniques. Wing Chun is somewhat unique, in that it rejects pure defense in principle, from the outset. The only Wing Chun defense is an overwhelming offense.

  My thoughts on ending fights are continued here.

• 40 Kenji // Feb 17, 2009

  Ever heard of Bullet Proof Monk? We should all go and watch the movie together.

• 41 Gintas // Apr 2, 2009

  I’m practising wing tsun.So is one thing,whyle oponent is on the ground,you fastest as you can kick,punch him,whyle he cannot stand up.It is selfdefence in the fight,so you must survive at all cost,whith no rules,and you can do anithing (just not killing) to fin

• 42 JFM // May 2, 2009

  The time to use lethal techniques is when one is attacked e.g robbery,asaault etc….There is a difference between a punch to the throat and a dislocated shoulder….one equates to possible death and the other to a medical situation. Being trained in xingyiquan I can attest to the fact that different
  situations call for different measures….the amount of force used must be equal to the threat of the situation. Do not fight if at all avoidable,,,do not let yourself be hurt if it is unavoidable.

• 43 Matthew // Jun 8, 2009

  I’ve been following this thread since December. Its a tease subject because we don’t know the circumstances of the neighbors, and details the incident.
  Since the neighbours used deadly force, our main seems to have miscalculated the effect of their loss of face in losing the hand-t0-hand combat, i.e.
  1. Was the dispute about their ability to enjoy their property, or the safety of their family, or ability to continue their (criminal) livelihood?
  2. Were the bad guys career criminals who could not afford to lose face in the eyes of the neighborhood criminals?
  3. Were the bad guys simply extremely unbalanced, i.e. psychotic?
  To knowingly risk jail time, they would need reasons for this very violent and risky behaviour, and so I posit 3 above.
  ALTERNATIVES:
  1. Assuming our good fellow knew of their criminal nature (to pull a gun if losing face in hand-to-hand combat), then he may have:
  a) immediately retreat to his property. Slowly back away from them while maintaining disagreement to their argument, but refusing to continue the discussion and agreeing to disagree.
  b) if they persisted shouting insults, threats, ripping up his mail, or threatening his family, or damaging his property, he could give one verbal warning, and then escalate to phoning the cops.
  Again, this is based on knowing how dangerous the bad guys were which very well may not have been possible. Our guy perhaps should have assumed the worst because they knew where he lived so he couldn’t afford to miscalculate.
  This is a very good thought experiment. It suits my interests because only nine months into WC training, I’m starting to realize I’m not prepared for how to use it.
  I wish to understand the severity of each move, so I can avoid maiming (or killing) someone when all I need to do is incapacitate them without serious injury, i.e. knockout, break some toes, sprain a wrist, crack a rib, or whatever.

• 44 Nigel // Jul 21, 2009

  In my most humble opinion, there is always a ways to stop a fight without hurting each other. Getting into a fight over a flared argument is different then a fight where the person really wants to take your life.

  Most martial arts nowdays in my opinion deals mainly with the ‘take your life’ part where danger is real.. either do or die kinda situation.

  My main point is that in fights started by argument or such, can be stopped once its started by giving the guy no reason to continue. Be calm, reasonable, flexible and most importantly sweep away your ego. Just like wing chun, one does not block a powerful direct attack but redirect it, be flexible and calm.

  If he starts to attack push him aside, if he comes again repeat. Keep pushing him away until he gets tired and with no energy left, he will not fight. Since he is not hurt, maybe only his pride, he might not be out again on a vengeance. Breaking his arm or etc will only make things worst. He might call his gang, get a gun, harm your family and etc.

  Quoted from Aikido’s history, the founder, a great swordsman, refused a fight from a challenger and when the challenger attacks, he slowly drain the challenger’s will or spirit to fight by avoiding, dodging and etc without injuring him. Thats the main principle of aikido. If i am mistaken feel free to correct me, m not gud wit words. xD

  Removing the opponent’s will to fight without injuring him would be my solid answer. No will = no mood to fight.

• 45 Peter // Jul 22, 2009

  Hi, I am studying Wing Chun for more than 13years. Dont be afraid, I am not going to start a thread about how WCH is the best art etc. I think most of the MA have the same roots. What I wanted to say is that people forget to adapt to the enviroment in which they live. If we all woul behave like many MA instructors, we will be still climbing on the trees and eating raw meat. Pistols, rifles, knifes, sticks and improvised weapons should be integral part of any MA. Instead of that some instructors seem to be left in the past. They are wearing pyjamas and are fighting with katanas etc. That is nice and I like it if you want to keep on the traditions, but you should be wise enough to know, that it wont defend you in a real world. BTW. I am carrying Glock 17…

• 46 Matthew // Jul 31, 2009

  Peter,
  1) The last time someone told me the firearms they owned, it was in a meeting with a former president of a company I worked for. They were threatening my life. So forgive me (and others) not welcome your sharing of your Glock 17.
  2) I don’t agree that is honourable to say “If we all would behave like many MA instructors, we will be still climbing on the trees and eating raw meat.” This is a personal attack, which is offensive, whether you are a raw-eat eater (as many First Nations in the Arctic are), or non-raw-meat eater who will be disgusted. I think you have lots left to learn if you can write such harsh words about MA instructors.
  3) “Pistols, rifles, knifes, sticks and improvised weapons should be integral part of any MA” — that’s what Special Forces training is for. They learn hand-to-hand combat, and weapons. I disagree that WC should be teaching further weapons. A pair of butterfly swords in your trunk should handle all but a gun. However, if you really are worried about facing a gun, move to Canada, or buy yourself a bulletproof vest. I and many others are quite happy with Wing Chun exactly as it is.
  4) “but you should be wise enough to know, that it wont defend you in a real world” Again I disagree. If you’re going to live in a dangerous place where people carry concealed weapons and shoot each other over parking spots, then I think you might want to consider moving.
  5) If you have a habit of pissing people off so they want to kill you, then that Glock in your pants will be little use. Someone who wants you dead will knock you off from behind you, to your rear diagonal sides, rooftops, places you’re not watching.
  6) At a certain point the aquisition of tools of war like guns can make you more paranoid. I recommend less weapons in your life (certainly less public posting of them) and a lot more love, and study of Buddhist philosophy which the monks who developed Wing Chun were devout believers in.

• 47 Peter // Aug 1, 2009

  Matthew,

  thank you for your answer. You helped me a lot with it. I started to write an answer for you and I did write 2 sites of A4. I will use it in an article on my website. To make long story short: I think you are great example of how todays MA practicioners do not understand MA. I will just ask you one question. Do you think that if all the great masters would live in a world where people are carrying guns and knives, they will develop techniques with butterfly swords and dragon poles? Don’t argue with me, just think about it for yourself.

  Peter

• 48 Chris // Aug 1, 2009

  Peter, interesting point. In fact, all the great masters alive today DO live in a world where people carry guns and knives.

• 49 Josh Young // Aug 1, 2009

  Comparisons are interesting aren’t they.

  Today, despite the advance in weapons, things are much safer than they were in rural lawless areas where angry mobs and bands of murdering thieves made their own rules.

  I agree a gun can help prepare for specific threats, but I note that people tend to die from heart disease and car accidents, not shootouts.

  So instead of working with guns and knives masters should wield bran Muffins and battle unsafe driving, if they are going to be practical.

  I say let them wear pajamas and play with floppy swords.
  Carrying guns is for killers, not masters.

• 50 Matthew // Aug 1, 2009

  Peter,
  The art of fencing continues on as a tradition and an Olympic sport, despite being invented long before guns.
  Defense from knife attacks is part of advanced Wing Chun training.
  I understand the best defense from an attack, even a weapon attack, is psychological by using words and body language to defuse the conflict.
  However, if someone is really motivated to kill me, then even if I carried a concealed firearm, I could still be murdered in a sneak attack. We are all vulnerable, and no martial art can guarantee our total defense in all circumstances.
  The most dangerous thing I do is drive on North America’s busiest highway several times a week, so I can attend training with a senior WC master, and I love it.
  Everyone is an individual and has their own opinions and wishes. I respect yours.
  I continue to disagree only with the negative and inaccurate claims about WC, which is an art I feel privileged to learn.
  Peace,
  Matthew

• 51 Peter // Aug 1, 2009

  Matthew,

  I never said anything unrespectfull about Wing Chun. I find quite unrespectfull using WC, WT etc. instead of full name of the art. About the pyjamas – I pointed this just because it shows how people don’t understand MA. The old masters were wearing this because it was common clothing those days. And they trained in the clothes they were wearing. And they trained with weapons which have been used. But your statements show your ignorance and total missunderstandigs of current fights/combats. Fights where you either kill or get killed. Not sports like fencing. There is a huge difference between UFC, MMA, kick-box and other martial sports and martial arts. And if u gave me example of olympic discipline as martial art, you probably do not understand that. I would call you Matthew a combat theoretic. You probably never encounter in a real fight. And that is the biggest problem of MA in general. Most today’s MA instructors never encounter in real fight, they have been never stabbed. They don’t know how does it feel to be stabbed with a broken bottle (I have this experience and let me tell you that it is not fun at all). And those combat theoretics are teaching people to survive. Do you understand what I mean?

  Still there are some very good instructors and I am very happy that I met some of them.

  I wish you Matthew and all the other guys as well that you never had to defend your family or loved ones agains real attack on the street!

  And I have to add one thing: I never understood the ignorance of some people. I have trained for a long time, both gunfighting and MA. And for me I never took it as 2 different things. But I heard very often from gun crowd something like: “I don’t need to learn how to fight because I am carrying my glock with me all the time.” And than on the other hand I hear statements like yours all the time long: “Only killers are carrying guns etc.” Do you know how stupid does this sound? All the police dpts are full of killers if this statement is true.

  Peter

• 52 Tenchu // Aug 24, 2009

  There’s no sensible answer to how to deal with that situation.

  Forgivness means poor character when you’ve nothing to say sorry for.

  Killing them cannot gaurentee the actions of their vengeful loved ones.

  Avoiding the fight altogether is just plain unrealistic.

  In the end, you’ll either fight or you won’t fight. Those who do ought to study the Way of the Warrior hard. What you’ll learn is the true Way is entangled in a spiral of death; you may sometimes die. Get over it. The Way of the Warrior is resolute acceptence of death.

  From the Hagakure:

  “Even if it seems certain that you will lose, retaliate. Neither wisdom nor technique has a place in this. A real man does not think of victory or defeat; he plunges recklessly towards an irrational death. By doing this, you will awaken from your dreams.”

  Just fight the damn fight. Going up against guns or not; if you’re so scared of death, I’d challenge you understood a breath of true life to begin with.

• 53 Chris // Aug 24, 2009

  “I am sorry…” does not mean “I was wrong.”

• 54 Kaur // Oct 15, 2009

  Dude your a complete moron, obviously the guy who was trained in wing chun didnt do enough damage to take down the two guys, if youd just watch a few videos of wing chun strikes. If youd read a little about wing chun then youd know that if you strike in the right place you can kill a person with just one hit. No shit that he couldnt defend him self against bullets, no fighting style in the world teaches you dodging bullet you moron. Think youve been watching too much Matrix -.-

• 55 Saharus // Jan 22, 2010

  Kaur,
  I must totally disagree with you. In streetfight you must be sure to defend adequately – you may kill if they are armed – knifes or guns / similiar things – not in a different case, otherwise you could end up in jail.

  My idea:
  I will say how would I behave – not what’s the best.

  I have studied WCH for one year – although I’m quite a quick learner so it could be someone else’s two or three years.

  I also am a person that is known to be quite, able to end an argument with a few words – so that would be my way – persuasion.
  If it would fail and I would be forced to fight I would not run – I am a man of honour. If they would be armed I would withdraw and there would be two possibilities – guns – I would run away, no chance of a fair fight. Knives etc. – if it would be possible I would find myself something to defend myself with. That would be the first encounter.

  The second encounter is more or less about the philosophy of the target (ie. the person that is going to be shot). I, for example, am quite alert all the time – something like half of a paranoia (I know how vulnerable a human is and so I want to be at least ready to defend myself), against guns well,
  first step would be WCH rotations (dodges, evasions or how is it named in English ^^ ) – that would buy a little time (perhaps a second, maybe less maybe more – dependant on the assailants – then optionaly there would be the HEADs DOWN rule (simply dropping to the ground )….. under the condition that we are outdoors…… followed by a few rolls (not straight away from attackers – it would be easy to aim with any firearm) and run.

  Other possibility can be thrown weapons (throwing knives, shurikens, darts etc.) – but they are concidered to be aggressive weapons.

  So in points:
  - be always alert,
  - have some (at least improvised) weapon with you – can be a keyring on a twine ( many people underestimate it but it’s a marvelous weapon) or anything else (telescopic baton also suits quite well)
  - and if you can avoid the fight, avoid it. – it can always end up in a bad way, there’s luck factor and even a master may lose to a beginner.

  —– REMEMBER, MARTIAL ARTS WERE CREATED TO PRESERVE AND DEVELOP BODY, NOT FOR FIGHTING. (that is what Peter should read)

  - running is one point, but it would encourage the aggressor – he would think a lot of himself and perhaps start terrorizing surroundings. – there are many aggressive egoists today, that’s the problem – to be solved, not omitted.

  but I am now speaking more of speech than of deeds. I do not think that I am good enough to accomplish all the things listed, though I would try to do so in many cased if I were in the situation.

• 56 Heath // Feb 5, 2010

  I recently got into a fight with a guy who was threatening his wife. There were also kids involved I told him that if he hit her I would step in and he went ape shit on me and threw me through a door. I got up and as he came at me I kicked him and we exchanged a few punches. I have studied Wing Chun for 9 years and had not ever used it until now. The next day I was informed I broke a few of his ribs. A martial artists must know when to fight and when not to and try hard to avoid it I made a bad call and should have just called the cops but I didn’t.

• 57 Saharus // Feb 5, 2010

  Very well Heath, but would calling cops solve anything (and have you solved anything? – perhaps yes, perhaps no), the question is how would the wife behave – if she would deny everything in fear then cops would be quite helpless. And you would be perhaps the only one able to help. If the wife would tell them what he was doing then he would probably have some problems – but that wouldn’t make him unable to assault his wife in some back alley for vengeance. Some deeds are good for changing some people and some are a method of convincing others. Think about it, you may have done the right thing at the place.

• 58 Chris // Feb 5, 2010

  It would be absurd for a martial artist to proclaim that “nobody should ever fight”!

  Sometimes I wonder if the people who insist on personally breaking them up, really just want a piece of the action.

• 59 rob // Mar 6, 2010

  fighting should be avoided if possible,
  but to engage in battle without the intent to crush
  your enemy and leave him unable to ever make war
  again is suicide!

• 60 drearystate // Mar 7, 2010

  i really doubt that aside from your internet and your games that you studied wing chun, and if you did you probably wouldnt post that crap here, if a martial artist made a mistake like you did it was probably because he didnt know what he was doing, the 1st thing you learn is to control the fight not accidentally hurt someone beyond what you were trying to do, 9 years…..yeah sure buddy

• 61 no one in particular // Mar 7, 2010

  The answer can be found by looking at how wars between nations are ended.

  The victor befriends the defeated.

  Brandon could only have ended the fight by forcing the enemies to be his friends. This can be done through force followed with compassion.

  Killing the enemies would have been a form of escalation.

  The fight will continue until someone ends it with compassion, or until too much blood is lost.

• 62 Saharus // Mar 7, 2010

  Ok Mr. Incognito (or No one in particular) has the point
  Great answer, though it is not always possible to persuade people. But I wholeheartedly agree.

• 63 rob // Mar 11, 2010

  being a wc student doesnt make you a saint,
  how do we know that brandon didnt start this mess in the first place?

• 64 Saharus // Mar 11, 2010

  You’ve got a point as well… in these times there are many masters that teach Wing Chun (and any other kung fu style) in aggressive way – which is not correct. Fight should be the last option – with run (but if you are a bad runner or you are cornered then you must fight). And there are many egoists that are learning kung fu only to break someone else’s bones ( those students usually stop learning kung fu quite soon after they start)

• 65 Malcolm Pauly // Mar 12, 2010

  Consider the origin of Wing Chun. Buddhist monks developed Shaolin style only to have spies teach it to the army. Wing Chun was developed by monks to a) beat the old-style, b) have a martial art that was master-able in three years instead of ten.

  In the spirit of those monks, I see Wing Chun as a way to defend oneself, and those weaker, from oppressive, political and violent threat.

  Had I started training in Wing Chun years before I did, I would have avoided being victim of a terrible crime by a state, against its own citizen.

  Out of curiosity, does anyone know if the Joint Task Force (American), or Joint Task Force Two (Canadian) train in Wing Chun? How about CIA, or CSIS?

  ::bow:: to those many Wing Chun students with more knowledge and training than I.

  Malcolm (in Toronto)

• Dean’s Dojo » Blog Archive » Conflict // Nov 7, 2007

  [...] at Martial Development, Chris put up an interesting post. You can read the original post, or this summary: Last month, [...]

• Hagakure: The Way of the Warrior is Forgiveness // Nov 7, 2007

  [...] Search ← His Wing Chun Couldn’t Win A Real Fight [...]

• The Best Martial Arts Movies of 2007 // Sep 10, 2008

  [...] glorification of violence. This stunningly brutal film illustrates an unfortunate truth: the fight isn’t over until everyone is satisfied, and nobody is content with a [...]

Leave a Comment