<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qigong and Energy Arts Forum &#8211; July 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/</link>
	<description>Martial arts for personal development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:18:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily. I would say that since 90% or so of the population has no idea of &quot;authentic&quot; qigong looks like, they can be fooled with non-authentic qigong, that is, something that is explained to the subject as qigong, but actually bears no resemblance to the real thing, as defined by those familiar with the authentic qigong.

Dance and music are concepts without concrete definitions to describe them. Have you heard &quot;Four Minutes and Thirty-Three Seconds?&quot; I wouldn&#039;t consider it music exactly, but other people seem to think so. Paintings (and qigong) are described by their processes. If I carve something out of clay, it would not be considered a painting. If I take a picture of something, frame it, and sell it as a painting, it would indeed be a &quot;fake painting,&quot; even if the picture is of a collection of pigments on a flat surface. Just waving my arms around in a ritualized and athletic manner certainly wouldn&#039;t make my actions qigong, would it?

The talisman of qigong is the actions and performance as witnessed by the subject, along with any information you provided them describing what qigong is, or information they had prior to the experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily. I would say that since 90% or so of the population has no idea of &#8220;authentic&#8221; qigong looks like, they can be fooled with non-authentic qigong, that is, something that is explained to the subject as qigong, but actually bears no resemblance to the real thing, as defined by those familiar with the authentic qigong.</p>
<p>Dance and music are concepts without concrete definitions to describe them. Have you heard &#8220;Four Minutes and Thirty-Three Seconds?&#8221; I wouldn&#8217;t consider it music exactly, but other people seem to think so. Paintings (and qigong) are described by their processes. If I carve something out of clay, it would not be considered a painting. If I take a picture of something, frame it, and sell it as a painting, it would indeed be a &#8220;fake painting,&#8221; even if the picture is of a collection of pigments on a flat surface. Just waving my arms around in a ritualized and athletic manner certainly wouldn&#8217;t make my actions qigong, would it?</p>
<p>The talisman of qigong is the actions and performance as witnessed by the subject, along with any information you provided them describing what qigong is, or information they had prior to the experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6836</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/#comment-6836</guid>
		<description>That is an interesting question.  A painting can be uninspired, or ineffectual, or it might just totally suck, but it can never be fake, can it?  Same for a musical composition, or a dance routine...

Anyway, with neither a needle nor a pill to serve as a talisman, I would expect &quot;fake&quot; qigong to underperform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting question.  A painting can be uninspired, or ineffectual, or it might just totally suck, but it can never be fake, can it?  Same for a musical composition, or a dance routine&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, with neither a needle nor a pill to serve as a talisman, I would expect &#8220;fake&#8221; qigong to underperform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6758</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martialdevelopment.com/blog/qigong-and-energy-arts-forum-july-2008/#comment-6758</guid>
		<description>Fake acupuncture over fake drugs? I wonder how the study on fake qigong will measure up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake acupuncture over fake drugs? I wonder how the study on fake qigong will measure up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
